For something released a little more recently (last month), take a look at Rainer Stropek's video series MVVM in WPF and Silverlight He flies right through it, but does an extremely good job of going from start to finish with an actual application.
Trying to grasp the concepts of MVVM, I have already read several blogs and looked at a few projects. From what I understand, a View is dumb, it just knows how to present something that is passed ...
I have a WPF application with multiple views. I want to switch from view 1 to view 2 and from there I can switch to multiple views. So I want a button on view 1 that loads view2 in the same window....
I'm trying to get a grasp on WPF and MVVM and have been making good progress. The WPF and MVVM side of things are going well. However, the XAML and data binding side is a whole other story :) How...
The MVVM framework could be helping, or something else is making it run on the UI thread, or you're just getting lucky. To ensure the continuation runs on the UI thread you can capture the UI TaskScheduler right before like so.
What is the project structure you end up with when using MVVM in WPF? From the tutorials I saw now, they usually have folders: Model, ViewModel and View. In Model you put classes like Person for
MVVM – Model View View Model So with the MVC and MVP patterns in front of us, let’s look at the MVVM pattern and see what differences it holds: The input begins with the View, not the View Model. While the View holds a reference to the View Model, the View Model has no information about the View.
Why we go for MVVM over MVC or MVP while dealing with WPF? What extra benefit we get by using this? Edit: To be honest , today I had an interview and I have been asked this question. I answered ...
MVVM guides us how to distribute responsibilities between classes in a GUI application. ViewModel projects the data from the Model into a format that fits the View.
